Awe: The Science and Psychology of Wonder

Human consciousness encompasses a vast spectrum of emotional states, yet few phenomena exert as profound a transformational power over cognition, social behavior, and existential perception as the experience of awe. Characterized by an encounter with stimuli so immense that they overwhelm existing cognitive frameworks, awe compels the mind to transcend mundane concerns, recalibrate subjective priorities, and confront the boundaries of human comprehension.

Awe

1. Concise Definition

Awe is defined within psychological and affective science as a complex, self-transcendent emotion elicited by perceptual or conceptual stimuli that possess vastness and challenge an individual’s current mental structures, thereby necessitating cognitive accommodation. It is fundamentally characterized by feelings of profound reverence, perceptual humility, and diminutive self-awareness in the presence of something perceived to surpass the ordinary scope of human agency or understanding.

In contemporary emotion theory, awe is classified as an epistemic and self-transcendent positive emotion. Unlike primary survival emotions such as fear or anger, which rapidly mobilize action-oriented behavioral schemas (such as fight or flight), awe initiates a temporary cessation of automatic cognitive processing. This cognitive pause fosters an exploratory mental state, heightening environmental receptivity and dissolving rigid ego boundaries.

Furthermore, awe occupies a distinct space at the nexus of affective neuroscience, social psychology, and evolutionary theory. It functions both as an affective appraisal mechanism that recalibrates internal representations of social hierarchies and natural environments, and as a potent prosocial catalyst that shifts motivational priorities from selfish individual survival toward collective interdependence and communal integration.

2. Etymology & Linguistic Origin

The historical trajectory of the term awe reflects a semantic migration from visceral terror to elevated aesthetic and spiritual wonder. The word derives from the Old English noun ege, which signified fear, dread, terror, or overwhelming trepidation, and was cognate with the Old Norse term agi, bearing a nearly identical meaning of distress, horror, or discipline. These Germanic forms trace back to the Proto-Germanic root *agiz-, which in turn stems from the Proto-Indo-European root *agh-, meaning “to be depressed,” “to fear,” or “to experience agonizing dread.”

Throughout the Middle English period (evolving as awe, aw, or aghe), the term retained its predominantly intimidating connotations, frequently employed in religious contexts to denote the terrifying majesty, retribution, and unassailable authority of the Divine. To stand in “awe of God” was to tremble before sovereign omnipotence with dread and submission.

By the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, influenced by aesthetic philosophy and philosophical treatises on the sublime, the term began to shed its purely negative valence. It increasingly absorbed connotations of veneration, profound respect, and reverential admiration. This evolutionary bifurcation is vividly preserved in modern English adjectives: awful originally meant “worthy of awe” or “filled with dread” before degrading colloquially into a synonym for bad or unpleasant, whereas awesome evolved to capture positive, breathtaking, and magnificent experiences.

3. Pronunciation & Grammatical Form

Pronunciation: In standard International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) notation, the word is transcribed as /ɔː/ in British Received Pronunciation and as /ɔː/ or /ɑː/ in General American English. It is a single-syllable word composed of an open-mid back rounded vowel sound.

Part of Speech and Inflections:

• Noun: Awe (uncountable, occasionally countable in specialized contexts, e.g., “an awe that silenced the crowd”). Functions as the direct or indirect object and subjective complement in syntactical structures denoting emotional states.
• Transitive Verb: Awe, awed, awing (or aweing). Means to strike, inspire, or overwhelm someone with reverence, wonder, or trepidation (e.g., “The celestial alignment awed the astronomers”).
• Derivative Adjectives: Awestruck or awestricken (overwhelmed by awe); awesome (inspiring awe; colloquially exceptional); awful (archaic: inspiring reverential fear; contemporary: extremely poor or objectionable).
• Derivative Adverb: Awesomely.

4. Detailed Conceptual Explanation

To fully grasp the psychological architecture of awe, researchers rely primarily on the prototype appraisal model established by Dacher Keltner and Jonathan Haidt (2003). This conceptual framework posits that awe is constituted by two central cognitive appraisals: the perception of vastness and the subsequent need for accommodation.

Perceived Vastness: Vastness refers to any stimulus that is experienced as significantly larger, more powerful, or more complex than the self or the individual’s baseline frame of reference. Crucially, vastness is not restricted to physical scale—such as the observable expanse of the cosmos, towering mountain ranges, or deep oceanic canyons. It encompasses social vastness (encountering charismatic authority, legendary leadership, or profound moral virtue), temporal vastness (contemplating geological epochs or evolutionary history), and conceptual vastness (grappling with mathematical infinity, quantum entanglement, or complex philosophical frameworks).

The Need for Accommodation: The second invariant appraisal dimension is rooted in Jean Piaget’s developmental epistemology. When an individual encounters novel information, they typically rely on assimilation, incorporating the new data directly into existing mental structures or schemas without modifying the overarching system. However, when a stimulus possesses overwhelming vastness, existing schemas fail to interpret or contain it. This failure creates cognitive disequilibrium, forcing the mind to undergo accommodation—the structural reorganization, expansion, and updating of mental models to make sense of the extraordinary phenomenon.

When the requirement for cognitive accommodation is successfully initiated, the emotional experience is felt as profound, enlightened awe, accompanied by curiosity and intellectual expansion. Conversely, if accommodation fails entirely and the vast stimulus continues to be perceived as threatening, unpredictable, or hostile, the experience curdles into dread, paralysis, or existential horror—a subtype known within affective science as “threat-based awe.”

A crucial downstream psychological consequence of these dual appraisals is the “small-self” phenomenon (or hypo-egoic state). When dwarfed by an immense stimulus, the psychological ego recedes. Self-referential narratives, daily anxieties, and status concerns diminish in salience. This transient reduction in self-focus does not manifest as depressive worthlessness; rather, it yields a liberation from self-absorption, cultivating subjective integration into a broader ecological, social, or cosmic whole.

5. Historical Development

The systematic examination of awe originated long before modern empirical psychology, evolving primarily through centuries of aesthetic philosophy, theology, and phenomenology.

In classical antiquity, Longinus composed the influential treatise On the Sublime (c. 1st century CE), examining how elevated rhetoric and majestic natural phenomena transport the listener into ecstatic rapture, overwhelming rational defenses with an irresistible power. For Longinus, the sublime was an experience of grandeur that expanded the human soul beyond its ordinary confines.

During the Enlightenment, the concept underwent rigorous philosophical formalization. Edmund Burke published A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful (1757), drawing an influential line between beauty and the sublime. Burke argued that while beauty produces relaxation and tender affection, the sublime is rooted in feelings of terror, obscurity, infinity, and power. The sublime produces an intense, paradoxical delight when the observer perceives danger or vastness from a position of relative physical safety.

Immanuel Kant advanced this discourse in his Critique of Judgment (1790) by bifurcating the sublime into two categories: the mathematical sublime, where the sheer infinite magnitude of nature overwhelms the imagination’s capacity to comprehend it visually, and the dynamical sublime, where nature’s omnipotent physical power (such as tempests or volcanic eruptions) reveals human physical vulnerability while simultaneously affirming intellectual and moral transcendence.

In the early twentieth century, German theologian Rudolf Otto introduced the concept of the numinous in The Idea of the Holy (1917). Otto characterized the core of religious experience as a dual encounter with the mysterium tremendum (an awe-inspiring, terrifying majesty that induces dread and creaturely humbleness) and the mysterium fascinans (an irresistibly intoxicating, alluring, and benevolent grace). Contemporaneously, American psychologist and philosopher William James explored awe-like phenomena in The Varieties of Religious Experience (1902), documenting how acute mystical encounters fundamentally restructure personal identity and existential purpose.

The modern scientific era of awe began in 2003 with the seminal publication of Dacher Keltner and Jonathan Haidt’s paper, “Approaching Awe, a Moral, Spiritual, and Highly Social Emotion,” in the journal Cognition & Emotion. This theoretical breakthrough operationalized awe as a measurable psychological construct, uncoupling it from exclusively theological confines and triggering a surge of empirical investigations across social psychology, cognitive science, and neurobiology.

6. Theoretical Foundations

The academic study of awe is supported by several prominent psychological and evolutionary frameworks:

Evolutionary-Functional Theory: Keltner and Haidt argued that awe evolved originally within social hierarchies as an adaptive emotional response to intensely charismatic, dominant, or wise conspecifics. Submissive displays and mental accommodation before powerful group leaders promoted social stability, reinforced in-group cohesion, and inhibited intra-group conflict. Over evolutionary time, this cognitive-affective machinery generalized beyond social hierarchies to encompass non-human stimuli, including vast physical landscapes, natural catastrophes, moral exemplars, and abstract intellectual systems.

Cognitive Appraisal Theory: Rooted in the appraisal traditions of Klaus Scherer and Richard Lazarus, awe is understood as the output of rapid, multidimensional evaluations of an environment. The appraisal pattern specific to awe involves high novelty, unexpectedness, massive perceived magnitude, low initial comprehensibility, and a perceived challenge to current coping or interpretive resources (Shiota, Campos, & Keltner, 2003). This specific appraisal profile distinguishes awe from related states such as joy, surprise, or interest.

Predictive Processing and Epistemic Expansion: Contemporary cognitive neuroscience conceptualizes the human brain as a hierarchical predictive machine that constantly generates top-down models to anticipate sensory inputs. In this view, awe occurs when an individual encounters a monumental “prediction error”—sensory data that radically departs from internal prior predictions. Rather than discarding the data or reacting with panic, the brain leverages awe to suppress top-down assumptions, radically update internal generative models, and prioritize bottom-up epistemic exploration.

Self-Transcendent Emotion Framework: Alongside gratitude, elevation, and compassion, awe is theorized as an other-oriented or self-transcendent emotion. These affective states inhibit egocentric reward centers and enhance sociocentric bonding mechanisms, acting as an evolutionary antidote to excessive individualism by orienting organisms toward collective preservation.

7. Key Components, Types & Dimensions

Awe manifests as a multifaceted syndrome involving distinct experiential, physiological, cognitive, and expressive facets:

• Core Cognitive Appraisals:
  • Perceived Vastness: Encountering an entity that dwarfs standard physical, temporal, social, or intellectual metrics.
  • Need for Accommodation: Recognition that pre-existing schemas cannot assimilate the novel stimulus, provoking cognitive reorientation.
• Affective Dimensions and Subtypes:
  • Positive (Benign) Awe: Elicited by magnificent, non-threatening stimuli (e.g., sublime vistas, masterworks of art, scientific revelations). Marked by wonder, optimism, peace, and prosocial orientation.
  • Threat-Based (Dark) Awe: Elicited by devastating, uncontrollable phenomena (e.g., tornadoes, authoritarian displays, catastrophic explosions). Infused with fear, vulnerability, powerlessness, and physiological vigilance.
  • Moral Awe (Elevation): Triggered by encounters with exceptional virtue, unconditional altruism, or supreme courage.
  • Physical/Natural Awe: Provoked by the sensory majesty of the cosmos, mountains, oceans, or biological systems.
  • Epistemic/Cognitive Awe: Initiated by conceptual, philosophical, or mathematical breakthroughs that dissolve intellectual paradigms.
• Physiological Correlates:
  • Piloerection: Somatosensory stimulation leading to goosebumps or chills, indicative of sympathetic nervous system engagement coupled with emotional intensity.
  • Vagal Nerve Modulation: Increased parasympathetic activation and elevated respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), signaling calm social engagement and reduced fight-or-flight defensiveness.
  • Cardiovascular Deceleration: Transient decreases in heart rate and respiratory rate as the individual arrests motion to process the visual and auditory field.
• Behavioral and Expressive Signs:
  • Facial Signature: Widened eyes, slightly elevated inner eyebrows, open and dropped jaw, and a relaxed or slightly parted mouth.
  • Vocalizations: Non-linguistic emotional utterances, characteristically the drawn-out “whoa” or aspirated “ah.”
  • Immobility: Postural freezing or cessation of motor exploration, facilitating focused attentional intake.

8. Examples & Illustrative Cases

Real-world manifestations of awe cross geographical, cultural, and professional boundaries, illustrating its universal resonance:

The Overview Effect in Space Exploration: One of the most documented cases of profound awe is the Overview Effect, a psychological transformation reported by astronauts viewing Earth from orbit or lunar transit (White, 1987; Yaden et al., 2016). Viewing the planet as a fragile, borderless sphere suspended in an indifferent void induces an instantaneous cognitive accommodation. Astronauts consistently report a radical dissolution of nationalistic identity, a dramatic surge in environmental protective drive, and an overwhelming feeling of unity with humanity.

Natural Landscapes and the American Wilderness: When naturalist John Muir documented his excursions into the Yosemite Valley and the High Sierra, he described encounters with towering granite monoliths and ancient giant sequoias in terms that epitomize benign awe. Muir noted that the physical vastness silenced his internal monologue, rendering mundane human ambitions irrelevant and substituting an expansive ecological reverie that shaped the modern conservation movement.

Architectural Scale and Sacred Spaces: Throughout history, human cultures have engineered physical structures explicitly designed to trigger awe. Stepping into a high Gothic cathedral—such as Chartres or Notre-Dame—or walking beneath the soaring dome of the Hagia Sophia forces an upward head tilt, an immediate intake of breath, and visual immersion in scale and light. The vast interior dimensions and complex acoustic reverberations systematically overwhelm ordinary spatial schemas, deliberately inspiring devotional humility.

Moral and Intellectual Encounters: Awe is frequently ignited without grand visual scale. Witnessing acts of radical self-sacrifice, such as historical figures standing resolutely against systemic tyranny (e.g., Harriet Tubman, Nelson Mandela), evokes moral awe. Similarly, physicists grasping the formulation of general relativity or mathematicians discovering Euler’s identity experience profound conceptual awe at the underlying order and balance of reality.

9. Measurement & Assessment

Empirical investigation into awe utilizes self-report inventories, physiological monitoring, behavioral assessments, and neuroimaging paradigms:

Dispositional Positive Emotion Scale (DPES – Awe Subscale): Developed by Michelle Shiota, Dacher Keltner, and Oliver John (2006), this widely used psychometric tool assesses an individual’s chronic, trait-level propensity to experience awe in daily life. Using a 7-point Likert scale, participants rate items such as “I often feel awe” and “I see beauty all around me.”

The Awe Experience Scale (AWE-S): Formulated by David B. Yaden and colleagues (2019), the AWE-S provides a robust, multidimensional assessment of state-based awe. The instrument evaluates six distinct facets derived from factor analyses: perceived vastness, need for accommodation, time alteration, feelings of self-diminution (the small self), perceived connectedness, and physical sensations (such as chills and goosebumps).

Situational and Experimental Inductions: In laboratory settings, researchers induce awe through several validated protocols:

• Immersive Virtual Reality (VR): Exposing subjects to high-fidelity, 360-degree simulations of outer space, deep ocean trenches, or aerial mountain flights.
• Video and Audio Elicitation: Utilizing panoramic clips from nature documentaries (e.g., BBC’s Planet Earth) set against soaring musical scores.
• Field Experiments: Escorting participants into natural environments, such as groves of mature Tasmanian blue gum trees, compared to mundane built environments (e.g., parking garages), as pioneered by Piff et al. (2015).

Physiological and Neuroimaging Markers: Researchers monitor electrocardiography (RSA and heart rate variability), electrodermal activity (galvanic skin response for piloerection detection), and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Neuroimaging approaches focus particularly on reduced activation within the Default Mode Network (DMN), a neural constellation correlated with self-referential thought and ego maintenance.

10. Applications & Practical Significance

The intentional cultivation of awe has broad practical implications across healthcare, education, leadership, and public policy:

Clinical Psychology and Mental Health: Because awe attenuates rumination and deactivates excessive ego preoccupation, it holds promise as an intervention for major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety, and chronic post-traumatic stress. By fostering a sense of the small self, awe interrupts pathological loops of self-criticism and catastrophic thinking, restoring a sense of perspective to personal crises.

Immunology and Physical Well-being: Empirical studies demonstrate that self-transcendent positive emotions, with awe as a primary driver, correlate with lower levels of systemic inflammation. Specifically, awe has been linked to reduced circulating levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), which in chronic elevations contribute to autoimmune disorders, cardiovascular pathology, and neurodegenerative decline.

Education and Pedagogical Innovation: Introducing awe into educational curricula transforms passive learning into dynamic inquiry. When students encounter vast, anomalous phenomena that destabilize their baseline assumptions, the resulting need for accommodation fuels intrinsic curiosity, critical thinking, and a drive to comprehend scientific and historical complexities.

Environmental Stewardship: Awe shifts individuals from an anthropocentric, extractive orientation toward an eco-centric view of nature. Research indicates that individuals primed with awe demonstrate an enhanced sense of interconnectedness with the biosphere, which translates into environmentally responsible consumption, reduced waste, and active support for conservation efforts.

11. Research & Empirical Evidence

The past two decades have yielded rigorous empirical literature substantiating the cognitive, social, and neurological markers of awe:

Prosociality and the “Small Self”: In a landmark series of studies, Paul Piff and colleagues (2015) examined how awe influences ethical behavior and generosity. Across multiple experiments—including one in which participants stood among towering eucalyptus trees—individuals experiencing awe demonstrated significantly greater generosity in economic distribution games, showed heightened ethical decision-making, and were more willing to assist an experimenter who dropped items. The researchers established that this prosocial shift was statistically mediated by the feeling of the “small self.”

Anti-Inflammatory Biomarkers: Stellar et al. (2015) at the University of California, Berkeley, investigated the physiological pathways linking emotion to biological health. Assessing salivary concentrations of interleukin-6 (IL-6) across varied positive affective states (including joy, pride, compassion, and amusement), the researchers discovered that the frequent experience of awe was the strongest negative predictor of pro-inflammatory cytokines, demonstrating that profound aesthetic and spiritual feelings exert measurable somatic effects.

Altered Time Perception: Rudd, Vohs, and Aaker (2012) demonstrated that awe fundamentally recalibrates subjective temporal duration. Stimulated by expansive imagery, participants experienced time as more abundant, felt less rushed, and exhibited a greater willingness to volunteer their personal time to assist others. This alteration of temporal processing counteracted the subjective “time famine” characteristic of modern industrial societies.

Neuroimaging Correlates: Functional neuroimaging studies (e.g., van Elk et al., 2019; Chirico et al., 2021) reveal that intense awe experiences are characterized by decreased metabolic activity in the precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex, and medial prefrontal cortex—key nodes of the Default Mode Network (DMN). This dampening mirrors the neural signatures observed during deep meditation and psychedelic states, confirming the neurological validity of ego-attenuation and self-transcendence.

12. Cultural & Cross-Cultural Considerations

While the fundamental appraisal criteria for awe—vastness and accommodation—are universal aspects of human psychology, its expression and affective tone vary considerably across cultures:

Independent vs. Interdependent Self-Construals: In Western, individualistic cultures (such as the United States and Northern Europe), awe is predominantly experienced through a positive, empowering lens. The small self is viewed as an expansive, liberating escape from individual burden. In contrast, in East Asian collectivistic contexts (such as China or Japan), where personal identity is already embedded within broad social and cosmic networks, awe frequently carries stronger undertones of social deference, duty, and threat-based caution (Bai et al., 2017). The small self in interdependent settings may reinforce hierarchical respect and relational harmony.

Linguistic Framing: Not all languages divide the emotional space identically. While English isolates awe, other languages rely on complex, blended constructs. The Japanese concept of mono no aware encompasses a deep, bittersweet aesthetic awe concerning the impermanence of all things, blending wonder with melancholic reverence. In Sanskrit, the aesthetic category of adbhuta rasa denotes the experience of the marvelous and astonishing, systematically codified within classical Indian dramaturgy.

Secularization and Modern Contexts: In contemporary secularized societies, nature, scientific discovery, and profound artistic encounters have largely supplanted ecclesiastical institutions as the primary triggers of awe. Conversely, in deeply religious societies, awe remains intimately bound to the divine, where it is experienced primarily through structured rituals, prayer, and encounters with the sacred.

13. Criticisms, Debates & Limitations

Despite the rapid expansion of research into awe, several methodological, theoretical, and conceptual controversies remain unresolved:

Laboratory Induction and Ecological Validity: Inducing genuine, profound awe in sterile laboratory environments poses major technical challenges. Scholars question whether short, two-dimensional nature video clips or consumer-grade virtual reality headsets reliably replicate the existential gravity, somatic weight, and visceral reality of standing atop an alpine summit or encountering a charismatic leader. Reliance on proxy stimuli risks studying mild amusement or aesthetic pleasure rather than authentic, paradigm-shifting awe.

Over-Reliance on Self-Report Measures: A significant portion of awe literature relies upon retrospective subjective self-reports and Likert scales. These instruments are susceptible to social desirability biases, semantic ambiguities, and retrospective cognitive reconstruction, highlighting the ongoing need for standardized, objective biological and behavioral benchmarks.

The Dark Side of Awe: Evolutionary and positive psychology have often focused on benign, prosocial awe, downplaying its darker manifestations. Historically, authoritarian regimes, demagogues, and fascist movements have deliberately deployed monumental architecture, choreographed mass rallies, and terrifying displays of military power to trigger awe. By inducing feelings of insignificance and subservience, such displays can suppress individual critical thinking, encourage uncritical obedience, and bind groups to destructive, genocidal objectives.

14. Related Terms & Distinctions

To preserve diagnostic and academic clarity, awe must be differentiated from closely allied emotional and cognitive states:

• Wonder: While awe is an instantaneous emotional response to overwhelming vastness requiring accommodation, wonder is an inquisitive, contemplative cognitive state characterized by an active desire to explore, understand, and explain the unknown. Wonder often succeeds awe once the initial emotional paralysis subsides.
• Admiration: Admiration involves high regard and social esteem for an individual’s extraordinary skills, talents, or accomplishments, but it lacks the overwhelming vastness and cognitive accommodation demand intrinsic to awe.
• Elevation: Coined by Jonathan Haidt, elevation is an other-praising moral emotion triggered specifically by witnessing acts of moral beauty, virtue, and selflessness. While moral awe and elevation overlap heavily, awe encompasses non-moral phenomena (e.g., storms, galactic images, mathematical concepts) that lack human ethical components.
• Fear/Terror: Fear is an avoidant emotion organized around immediate threat, physical peril, and survival, activating fight-or-flight mechanisms. Although threat-based awe contains elements of fear, it requires an element of vastness and structural accommodation that raw survival panic lacks.
• Surprise: Surprise is a transient, domain-general response to an unexpected stimulus, lasting only seconds before resolving into another emotion (e.g., happiness, anger, fear). Awe involves an enduring, complex cognitive restructuring that persists beyond brief startle reactions.

15. Summary / Key Takeaways

Awe represents an essential human capacity that integrates sensory perception, cognitive adaptability, and social cohesion. It is defined fundamentally by the dual appraisals of vastness—whether physical, conceptual, or moral—and the acute need for accommodation, which forces the mind to reconstruct its internal cognitive architecture.

Far from being an ephemeral luxury, awe plays a vital role across multiple levels of analysis. Evolutionarily, it fosters social bonds and group alignment. Cognitively, it mitigates epistemic rigidity, shifts focus away from the ego, and awakens an open, inquisitive mindset. Somatically, it attenuates stress reactivity and downregulates inflammatory biomarkers. As empirical science continues to decipher its neurobiological circuits and therapeutic potential, awe stands out not merely as an intense, fleeting feeling, but as a gateway to human connection, scientific curiosity, and psychological resilience.

Ultimately, experiencing awe allows individuals to step outside the narrow confines of the self-absorbed mind, look up at an infinitely complex cosmos, and locate their place within the broader tapestry of reality.

References

• Bai, Y., Maruskin, L. A., Chen, S., Gordon, A. M., Stellar, J. E., McNeil, G. D., Peng, K., & Keltner, D. (2017). Awe, the diminished self, and collective engagement: Universals and cultural variations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(2), 185–209.
• Burke, E. (1757). A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. R. and J. Dodsley.
• Chirico, A., Ferrise, F., Cordella, L., & Gaggioli, A. (2018). Designing awe in virtual reality: An experimental study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2351.
• Kant, I. (1790). Kritik der Urteilskraft [Critique of Judgment]. Lagarde und Friederich.
• Keltner, D., & Haidt, J. (2003). Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and highly social emotion. Cognition & Emotion, 17(2), 297–316.
• Otto, R. (1917). Das Heilige: Über das Irrationale in der Idee des Göttlichen und sein Verhältnis zum Rationalen [The Idea of the Holy]. Trewendt & Granier.
• Piff, P. K., Dietze, P., Feinberg, M., Stancato, D. M., & Keltner, D. (2015). Awe, the small self, and prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(6), 883–899.
• Rudd, M., Vohs, K. D., & Aaker, J. (2012). Awe expands people’s perception of time, alters decision making, and enhances well-being. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1130–1136.
• Shiota, M. N., Keltner, D., & John, O. P. (2006). Positive emotion dispositions paying attention to the details: Dispositional awe, curiosity, and aesthetic pride. Cognition & Emotion, 20(6), 844–864.
• Stellar, J. E., John-Henderson, N., Anderson, C. L., Gordon, A. M., McNeil, G. D., & Keltner, D. (2015). Positive affect and markers of inflammation: Discrete positive emotions predict lower levels of inflammatory cytokines. Emotion, 15(2), 129–133.
• van Elk, M., Arciniegas Gomez, M. A., van der Zwaag, W., van Schie, H. T., & Sauter, D. (2019). The neural correlates of the awe experience: Reduced default mode network activity during feelings of awe. Human Brain Mapping, 40(12), 3561–3574.
• White, F. (1987). The Overview Effect: Space Exploration and Human Evolution. Houghton Mifflin.
• Yaden, D. B., Haidt, J., Hood, R. W., Vago, D. R., & Newberg, A. B. (2016). The varieties of self-transcendent experience. Review of General Psychology, 21(2), 143–160.
• Yaden, D. B., Kaufman, S. B., Hyde, E., Chirico, A., Gaggioli, A., Wei, M., & Keltner, D. (2019). The development of the Awe Experience Scale (AWE-S): A multifactorial measure for research in the lab and field. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(4), 474–488.