Antibiotic: Mechanisms, Classification, and Impact

A comprehensive academic dictionary entry on antibiotics, exploring their mechanisms of action, historical evolution, classification, clinical utility, and the global challenge of antimicrobial resistance.

Dr. Mohammed Looti An academic and researcher specialized in
PUBLISHED
Scientifically Reviewed · Dr. Marwa Abd-Alazim · October 23, 2026
Medically & Scientifically Reviewed Verified: October 23, 2026
Dr. Marwa Abd-Alazim PhD in Psychology
Faculty Member • University of Kerbala
Review Criteria & Clinical Standards

This content undergoes rigorous scientific peer-review and medical editorial standards at Arab Psychology Network to ensure clinical accuracy, validity, and compliance with evidence-based guidelines from leading psychological and healthcare authorities (APA / WHO).

The discovery and development of antibiotics represent one of the most profound scientific achievements in modern human history, fundamentally reshaping global morbidity and mortality paradigms. Before the clinical implementation of antimicrobial chemotherapy, minor superficial abrasions, systemic bacteremia, and routine communicable illnesses such as streptococcal pharyngitis or bacterial pneumonia carried substantial mortality rates. Today, antibiotics serve as the foundational cornerstone for modern medical procedures, including invasive surgical interventions, solid organ transplantation, and cytotoxic cancer chemotherapy, all of which rely inextricably upon prophylactic and therapeutic bacterial suppression.

Antibiotic

1. Concise Definition

An antibiotic is a low-molecular-weight chemical substance produced naturally by microorganisms, synthesized semi-synthetically, or engineered completely synthetically that selectively inhibits the growth of or destroys viable pathogenic or commensal bacteria at low concentrations without exerting intolerable cytotoxic harm to the eukaryotic host organism. Unlike non-selective antiseptics or topical disinfectants, antibiotics exploit distinct biochemical, structural, and physiological divergences between prokaryotic and eukaryotic cellular machinery to achieve systemic targeted efficacy.

In modern biomedical science and clinical pharmacology, the scope of the term frequently overlaps with the broader designation antibacterial agent. While classical historical definitions restricted the designation strictly to naturally occurring secondary metabolites derived from filamentous fungi or actinomycetes, modern medical nomenclature encompasses semi-synthetic derivatives engineered to withstand enzymatic degradation as well as purely synthetic chemotherapeutic entities, such as fluoroquinolones, oxazolidinones, and sulfonamides, that achieve analogous antibacterial outcomes.

2. Etymology & Linguistic Origin

The term antibiotic traces its linguistic lineage to classical Greek roots, fusing the prefix anti- (ἀντί), signifying “against,” “opposed to,” or “counter,” with the substantive noun bios (βίος), meaning “life” or “mode of living.” In nineteenth-century biological literature, the French physician and naturalist Jean Paul Vuillemin initially introduced the French coinage antibiose (antibiosis) in 1889 to characterize an asymmetrical ecological relationship wherein one living organism destroys another to secure its own survival within a competitive ecological niche.

The formal transition of the root into modern biomedical English occurred in 1941 when the Russian-American microbiologist and soil ecologist Selman Waksman, who later received the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for the discovery of streptomycin, systematically defined an “antibiotic” as an organic chemical substance produced by microorganisms possessing the capacity to inhibit the proliferation of or eradicate other microorganisms in dilute solutions. Over subsequent decades, this operational definition expanded to assimilate chemically modified and fully synthetic compounds that retain bacterial selectivity.

3. Pronunciation & Grammatical Form

The word antibiotic is pronounced phonetically in standard International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) notation as /ˌæn.ti.baɪˈɒt.ɪk/ in Received Pronunciation (British English) and /ˌæn.tə.baɪˈɑː.t̬ɪk/ or /ˌæn.taɪ.baɪˈɑː.t̬ɪk/ in General American English.

Grammatically, the term functions primarily as a countable noun (plural: antibiotics), referencing specific drug classes or formulations (e.g., “broad-spectrum antibiotics”). Secondarily, it functions as an adjective modifying biological phenomena, therapies, or physiological properties (e.g., “antibiotic therapy,” “antibiotic prophylaxis,” or “antibiotic stewardship”). Related linguistic derivations include the adverbial form antibiotically and nominalized composite phrases such as antibiotic resistance.

4. Detailed Conceptual Explanation

At its fundamental biological core, antibiotic activity relies on the principle of selective toxicity, an epistemological framework first articulated by Paul Ehrlich. Selective toxicity posits that an effective pharmacotherapeutic agent must exert potent, lethal, or inhibitory pharmacological disruption against unique physiological structures or biosynthetic cascades of an invading pathogen while minimizing adverse chemical disruptions to the eukaryotic host cells. Because bacterial cells are fundamentally prokaryotic, they diverge profoundly from human eukaryotic cells in cell wall construction, ribosome composition, nucleic acid metabolism, and enzymatic metabolic pathways, offering diverse pharmacological targets.

Antibiotics are categorized fundamentally by their primary pharmacodynamic interaction with bacterial populations: bactericidal agents actively eradicate target microorganisms, leading to cellular lysis or irreversible metabolic catastrophe, whereas bacteriostatic agents arrest bacterial replication, cellular division, and protein translation without immediately lysing the cell. Bacteriostatic mechanisms hold bacterial titers in check, providing an indispensable temporal window for host immune effectors—namely polymorphonuclear neutrophils, tissue macrophages, and complement cascades—to phagocytose and clear the stagnant bacterial population.

The spectrum of antibacterial activity serves as another vital structural boundary. Narrow-spectrum antibiotics demonstrate concentrated selective efficacy against discrete subsets of bacterial taxa, such as Gram-positive cocci or specific obligate anaerobes, leaving the broader microflora relatively undisturbed. Conversely, broad-spectrum antibiotics affect an expansive phylogenetic spectrum encompassing both Gram-positive and Gram-negative species. Although broad-spectrum regimens are indispensable for empirical therapy in life-threatening systemic sepsis when the exact causative organism remains unidentified, their non-selective actions disrupt the host mucosal and gastrointestinal microbiome, potentially precipitating severe secondary complications such as superinfections by opportunistic pathogens.

Furthermore, antibiotic efficacy relies upon precise pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions. Time-dependent antibiotics, exemplified by beta-lactams, require plasma drug concentrations to remain persistently above the pathogen’s minimum inhibitory concentration for an extended duration of the dosing interval. In contrast, concentration-dependent antibiotics, such as aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones, require high peak serum concentrations relative to the minimum inhibitory threshold to maximize bacterial killing rates through sustained post-antibiotic inhibitory effects.

5. Historical Development

While empirical historical practices incorporated antimicrobial molds, earth extracts, and fermented poultices into ancient Egyptian, Greek, and Chinese traditional wound care, empirical scientific characterization did not commence until the late nineteenth century. The advent of Robert Koch’s germ theory of disease spurred researchers to search for specific chemical counteragents. Paul Ehrlich initiated the field of targeted chemotherapeutic design, developing the arsenic derivative Arsphenamine (Salvarsan) in 1909 for Treponema pallidum, validating the hypothesis that synthetic chemicals could destroy specific pathogenic microbes in vivo.

In 1928, Scottish bacteriologist Alexander Fleming serendipitously observed a zone of bacterial clearance surrounding a contaminating mold colony of Penicillium notatum on a staphylococcal agar plate at St. Mary’s Hospital, London. Although Fleming documented the inhibitory qualities of the substance he dubbed “penicillin,” he struggled to isolate and purify the inherently unstable metabolite in quantities sufficient for systemic clinical administration.

The therapeutic potential of penicillin was actualized in the early 1940s by a multidisciplinary team at the University of Oxford led by Howard Florey, Ernst Chain, and Norman Heatley. Amid the industrial pressures of World War II, the Oxford group transitioned penicillin production from laboratory-scale glassware to submerged industrial fermentation in the United States. Concurrently, Gerhard Domagk demonstrated the in vivo antibacterial efficacy of Prontosil, a red azo dye that metabolized into sulfanilamide, establishing the clinical efficacy of sulfonamides in the 1930s.

The decades spanning the late 1940s through the late 1970s are universally recognized as the “Golden Age” of antibiotic discovery. Systematically isolating actinomycetes and filamentous fungi from worldwide soil samples, academic and pharmaceutical investigators discovered major molecular classes: streptomycin (1943), chloramphenicol (1947), tetracyclines (1948), erythromycin (1952), vancomycin (1956), cephalosporins (1958), and rifamycins (1965). Subsequent medicinal chemistry efforts focused on modifying these natural molecular scaffolds to bypass early emerging beta-lactamase enzymes, optimize oral bioavailability, and broaden chemical stability.

6. Theoretical Foundations

The biological rationale underpinning antibiotic discovery and function rests upon evolutionary biology, cellular microbiology, and pharmacological receptor theory. In nature, natural antibiotics are not engineered altruistic human medicines; they represent defensive adaptations and signaling molecules produced during resource-limited conditions by soil-dwelling saprophytes to mediate intermicrobial competition and environmental niche defense.

Bacterial vulnerability to antibiotics depends on differences in cellular architecture between prokaryotic organisms and eukaryotic hosts. The fundamental theoretical frameworks underpinning drug mechanisms include:

  • Peptidoglycan Synthesis Theory: Prokaryotes maintain osmotic homeostasis using a dynamic, cross-linked rigid cell wall made of repeating units of N-acetylglucosamine (NAG) and N-acetylmuramic acid (NAM) cross-linked by transpeptidase enzymes. Because eukaryotic animal cells lack both peptidoglycan polymers and transpeptidases, pharmacological disruption of this pathway creates severe osmotic instability and selective autolytic rupture of dividing bacteria.
  • Selective Ribosomal Subunit Inhibition: While eukaryotic cytoplasmic translation relies upon the sedimentation-defined 80S ribosome (consisting of 40S and 60S subunits), prokaryotes utilize the structurally distinct 70S ribosome (consisting of 30S and 50S subunits). Antibiotics exploit these divergent spatial and stereochemical arrangements to arrest elongation or induce lethal translational misreading without terminating host protein synthesis.
  • Enzymatic Topoisomerase Trapping: Bacterial cells condense circular double-stranded genomic DNA using type II topoisomerases, specifically bacterial DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV. Synthetic fluoroquinolones stabilize the covalent topoisomerase-cleaved DNA complex, converting the physiological uncoiling apparatus into an agent of double-stranded DNA fragmentation.

7. Key Components, Types & Dimensions

Antibiotics are classified based on their primary molecular structure and corresponding bacterial target site:

  • Beta-Lactams: Characterized structurally by a core four-membered beta-lactam ring, this overarching class includes penicillins (e.g., ampicillin), cephalosporins (e.g., ceftriaxone), carbapenems (e.g., meropenem), and monobactams (e.g., aztreonam). They covalently bind and inactivate penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), disrupting peptidoglycan cross-linking and triggering autolysis.
  • Glycopeptides and Lipoglycopeptides: Bulky hydrophilic molecules, such as vancomycin and dalbavancin, that bind directly to the terminal D-alanyl-D-alanine pentapeptides of peptidoglycan precursors, sterically blocking transglycosylase and transpeptidase polymerizations in Gram-positive organisms.
  • Aminoglycosides: Highly polar polycationic compounds, such as gentamicin, amikacin, and tobramycin, that bind irreversibly to the 16S rRNA component of the 30S ribosomal subunit, causing conformational distortion, codon misreading, truncated aberrant protein synthesis, and outer membrane disruption.
  • Macrolides, Lincosamides, and Streptogramins (MLS group): Characterized by large macrocyclic lactone rings (e.g., azithromycin, clarithromycin, clindamycin), these compounds reversibly bind the 23S rRNA within the 50S ribosomal subunit, obstructing the nascent polypeptide exit tunnel and causing premature peptidyl-tRNA dissociation.
  • Tetracyclines and Glycylcyclines: Broad-spectrum compounds (e.g., doxycycline, tigecycline) that reversibly associate with the 30S ribosomal subunit, preventing the stable entry and binding of aminoacyl-tRNA to the ribosomal A-site, thereby arresting peptide elongation.
  • Fluoroquinolones: Synthetic bactericidal agents (e.g., ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin) that target DNA gyrase (GyrA subunit) in Gram-negative bacteria and topoisomerase IV (ParC subunit) in Gram-positive bacteria, precipitating double-stranded breaks and aborting DNA replication.
  • Rifamycins: Macrocyclic antibiotics (e.g., rifampin) that selectively inhibit bacterial DNA-dependent RNA polymerase, blocking initial transcription initiation cascades.
  • Sulfonamides and Trimethoprim: Antimetabolites that execute sequential synergistic inhibition of the bacterial tetrahydrofolate synthesis cascade, preventing purine synthesis and subsequent genomic replication.
  • Oxazolidinones: Synthetic ribosomal inhibitors, such as linezolid, that bind unique pockets within the 23S ribosomal RNA of the 50S subunit, preventing the initial assembly of the functional 70S initiation complex.
  • Polymyxins: Cationic cyclic lipopeptides (e.g., colistin, polymyxin B) that function essentially as detergents, interacting electrostatically with the lipid A moiety of lipopolysaccharide in Gram-negative outer membranes, inducing outer and inner membrane disruption.

8. Examples & Illustrative Cases

The clinical application of antibiotics can be observed through standard scenarios illustrating empirical selection, targeted therapy, and the physiological consequences of antimicrobial therapy.

Case 1: Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia. An otherwise healthy 64-year-old patient presents to the emergency department with acute hyperpyrexia, tachypnea, productive cough with purulent sputum, and an oxygen saturation of 89% on ambient air. Chest radiography demonstrates right middle lobe alveolar consolidation. Given the high probability of classical community-acquired pathogens such as Streptococcus pneumoniae and atypical intracellular organisms like Legionella pneumophila or Mycoplasma pneumoniae, empirical therapy is initiated with a dual regimen consisting of an intravenous beta-lactam (ceftriaxone) combined with an oral macrolide (azithromycin). Ceftriaxone targets cell wall synthesis in extracellular pathogens, while azithromycin penetrates eukaryotic lung tissue to inhibit atypical bacterial 50S ribosomal translation. When blood and sputum cultures confirm penicillin-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae 48 hours later, treatment is de-escalated to targeted high-dose oral amoxicillin, demonstrating diagnostic antimicrobial stewardship.

Case 2: Post-Antibiotic Microbiome Perturbation and Superinfection. A 72-year-old patient receives a prolonged four-week course of intravenous piperacillin-tazobactam for an intra-abdominal abscess. Although the primary infection resolves, the extended course of this broad-spectrum agent eradicates commensal gut bacteria, particularly normal obligate anaerobes (Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes). Deprived of microbial competition, bile salt-mediated suppression, and metabolic barrier signaling, spore-forming, toxin-producing Clostridioides difficile proliferates rapidly, triggering severe pseudomembranous colitis characterized by watery diarrhea, leukocytosis, and colonic inflammation. Management requires prompt cessation of the broad-spectrum agent and targeted therapy with oral vancomycin or fidaxomicin to suppress the emergent pathogen.

9. Measurement & Assessment

Quantifying bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics is crucial for informing clinical therapy and monitoring public health trends. Susceptibility testing uses standardized phenotypic and genotypic methodologies overseen by international bodies such as the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST).

The benchmark metric for determining antibiotic potency in vitro is the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC), defined as the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial agent capable of preventing visible in vitro microbial growth following an incubation window (typically 18–24 hours) under controlled conditions. MIC is determined using broth microdilution, macro-dilution, or automated spectrophotometric systems. A related metric, the Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC), measures the lowest concentration required to kill 99.9% of the original bacterial inoculum.

Agar-based methods provide semi-quantitative and qualitative data. The Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method places standardized antibiotic-impregnated filter paper disks onto agar plates uniformly inoculated with a bacterial isolate; the resulting radial clearings (zones of inhibition) are measured in millimeters and categorized as Susceptible (S), Intermediate (I), or Resistant (R) according to established clinical breakpoints. The E-test (Epsilometer test) uses plastic reagent strips embedded with continuous calibrated exponential antibiotic concentration gradients, allowing direct reading of the MIC at the intersection of the elliptical inhibition margin.

In critical care settings, molecular diagnostics increasingly complement classic phenotypic cultures. Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) assays, whole-genome sequencing (WGS), and multiplex nucleic acid hybridization panels identify specific resistance-conferring genes within hours. Key markers include mecA (mediating methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus via the altered PBP2a transpeptidase), vanA and vanB (mediating vancomycin resistance via D-Ala-D-Lac cell-wall remodeling), and diverse carbapenemase genes such as blaKPC, blaNDM, and blaOXA.

10. Applications & Practical Significance

The practical utility of antibiotics extends far beyond treating routine community infections, serving as an indispensable pillar of modern systemic medicine:

  • Surgical Prophylaxis: Administering targeted antibiotics—frequently cefazolin—within 60 minutes prior to surgical incision minimizes surgical site infections across cardiothoracic, orthopedic, colorectal, and vascular procedures, preventing pathogen seeding into deep tissues and prosthetic implants.
  • Support for Oncology and Critical Care: Intensive cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens, bone marrow ablations, and solid organ transplantations induce profound, prolonged neutropenia and immunosuppression. Prophylactic and preemptive broad-spectrum antibiotic regimens prevent opportunistic bacterial bacteremia during periods of immune vulnerability.
  • Pediatric and Obstetric Care: Universal prenatal screening for group B Streptococcus (GBS) coupled with intrapartum intravenous penicillin prophylaxis protects neonates from life-threatening early-onset sepsis and meningitis during delivery.
  • Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture: Antibiotics are employed in veterinary medicine to manage clinical herd infections, companion animal diseases, and, historically, as subtherapeutic growth promoters in livestock. However, agricultural use is increasingly restricted globally due to concerns regarding the horizontal transmission of resistant zoonotic pathogens.

11. Research & Empirical Evidence

Extensive clinical and pharmacological research indicates that while antibiotics have saved millions of lives, their widespread use has accelerated the evolution of bacterial survival mechanisms. The global escalation of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents a significant threat to global health systems.

A landmark 2022 systematic evaluation published by the Global Research on Antimicrobial Resistance (GRAM) project analyzed data across 204 countries and territories, estimating that in 2019 alone, bacterial AMR was directly responsible for approximately 1.27 million deaths globally and played an indirect contributing role in 4.95 million fatalities. Leading pathogens included carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Mechanistic research indicates that resistance traits spread across phylogenetically divergent bacterial populations via horizontal gene transfer (HGT), mediated by plasmids, transposons, and bacteriophages via conjugation, transformation, and transduction. In response, modern therapeutic strategies explore alternative modalities, including engineered bacteriophage therapy, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), selective monoclonal antibodies, and small-molecule adjuvants designed to inhibit bacterial efflux pumps or neutralize resistance enzymes.

12. Cultural & Cross-Cultural Considerations

Antibiotic consumption and prescription dynamics vary substantially across diverse sociopolitical contexts, driven by divergent healthcare infrastructures, regulatory mechanisms, socioeconomic status, and cultural beliefs. In many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), economic pressures, limited laboratory diagnostic infrastructure, and unregulated supply chains permit the over-the-counter sale of systemic antibiotics without a medical prescription. In these environments, patients often purchase subtherapeutic fractional doses, inadvertently accelerating selective resistance pressures in circulating bacterial populations.

Conversely, in high-income settings with tightly regulated prescription frameworks, overprescribing is often driven by diagnostic ambiguity, defensive clinical practices, and high patient expectations for immediate remedies during self-limiting viral respiratory infections. Cross-cultural qualitative studies indicate that deep-seated assumptions framing antibiotics as panaceas for non-specific febrile illnesses remain widespread, highlighting the ongoing need for public health education alongside clinical stewardship programs.

13. Criticisms, Debates & Limitations

The contemporary deployment of antibiotics involves significant clinical and economic controversies:

First, the conventional commercial marketplace for antibiotic discovery suffers from economic structural failure. Because antibiotics are prescribed for short curative durations (often 5–14 days) and newer, highly potent agents are reserved as late-stage therapeutic options by hospital stewardship panels, pharmaceutical companies often struggle to recoup research and clinical trial development costs. Consequently, several large pharmaceutical corporations have downsized or shuttered their antimicrobial research divisions, leading experts to advocate for alternative incentive models, such as transferable exclusivity vouchers, subscription-based “Netflix models,” and direct government-subsidized development grants.

Second, medical dogma regarding antibiotic treatment duration is undergoing significant empirical re-evaluation. Historically, patients were universally advised to complete full courses of antibiotics even after total symptom resolution, under the premise that early discontinuation would select for resistant organisms. However, contemporary randomized clinical trials indicate that for diverse indications, including uncomplicated cellulitis, community-acquired pneumonia, and pyelonephritis, shorter courses (e.g., 5 to 7 days) match the clinical cure rates of traditional 10-to-14-day regimens while reducing collateral damage to the host microbiome and lowering the selective pressure that drives drug resistance.

14. Related Terms & Distinctions

Understanding antibiotics requires distinguishing them from related concepts in pharmacology and microbiology:

  • Antibacterial: An overarching classification encompassing all chemical, synthetic, or biological agents that inhibit or eradicate bacteria. While all systemic antibiotics are targeted antibacterials, non-selective chemical antiseptics (e.g., chlorhexidine) and topical sanitizers also fall under this umbrella term.
  • Antimicrobial: A broader pharmacological designation encompassing all pharmacological agents deployed against microscopic organisms, including antibiotics (antibacterials), antifungals (e.g., fluconazole), antivirals (e.g., remdesivir), and antiparasitics (e.g., ivermectin).
  • Disinfectant: A non-selective chemical formulation (e.g., sodium hypochlorite, glutaraldehyde) intended for application to inanimate objects to destroy surface-bound microflora, displaying high non-specific cellular toxicity that precludes systemic administration.
  • Antiseptic: A non-selective, broadly biocidal chemical agent (e.g., povidone-iodine, isopropyl alcohol) safe for topical application on living cutaneous tissue or mucous membranes, yet lacking the selective, internal molecular targeting characteristic of true systemic antibiotics.
  • Bacteriophage: A naturally occurring or bioengineered virus that infects and lyses specific bacterial hosts, offering a targeted alternative to broad-spectrum chemical antibiotics.

15. Summary / Key Takeaways

Antibiotics represent precision pharmacological agents that exploit evolutionary and cellular differences between prokaryotic microorganisms and eukaryotic host cells. Through distinct mechanisms—such as the disruption of peptidoglycan cell walls, the inhibition of 70S ribosomal protein translation, and the blocking of nucleic acid machinery—they eliminate or suppress bacterial pathogens. However, the selective evolutionary pressure exerted by systemic antibiotic use has driven the global emergence of antimicrobial resistance, threatening modern healthcare delivery. Sustaining the clinical efficacy of these agents requires robust diagnostic testing, coordinated international antibiotic stewardship, reduced non-therapeutic agricultural use, and sustained investment in new antimicrobial drug discovery pipelines.

Ultimately, preserving the therapeutic efficacy of antibiotics is a shared clinical, scientific, and societal responsibility. Mitigating the development of drug-resistant pathogens will depend on multidisciplinary collaboration, refined clinical stewardship strategies, and continued innovations in biomedical diagnostics and drug development.

References

  • Blair, J. M., Webber, M. A., Baylay, A. J., Ogbolu, D. O., & Piddock, L. J. (2015). Molecular mechanisms of antibiotic resistance. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 13(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3380
  • Fleming, A. (1929). On the antibacterial action of cultures of a penicillium, with special reference to their use in the isolation of B. influenzae. British Journal of Experimental Pathology, 10(3), 226–236.
  • Murray, C. J., Ikuta, K. S., Sharara, F., Swetschinski, L., Robles Aguilar, G., Gray, A., … & Naghavi, M. (2022). Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: A systematic analysis. The Lancet, 399(10325), 629–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0
  • Waksman, S. A. (1947). What is an antibiotic or an antibiotic substance?. Mycologia, 39(5), 565–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/00275514.1947.12017635
  • Walsh, C. T., & Wencewicz, T. A. (2016). Antibiotics: Challenges, mechanisms, opportunities. American Society for Microbiology Press.

Cite This Article

Looti, M. (2026, October 23). Antibiotic: Mechanisms, Classification, and Impact. PSYCHOLOGICAL DATABASE. https://english.arabpsychology.com/dictionary/antibiotic-mechanisms-classification-impact/
Looti, Mohammed. “Antibiotic: Mechanisms, Classification, and Impact.” PSYCHOLOGICAL DATABASE, 23 October 2026, https://english.arabpsychology.com/dictionary/antibiotic-mechanisms-classification-impact/.
Looti, Mohammed. “Antibiotic: Mechanisms, Classification, and Impact.” PSYCHOLOGICAL DATABASE. October 23, 2026. https://english.arabpsychology.com/dictionary/antibiotic-mechanisms-classification-impact/.